What does double income without children (DINK) mean?
“Double income, no children” (DINK) is a slang expression for a household in which there are two incomes and no children (both partners work or one has two incomes). DINKs are often the target of marketing efforts for luxury items such as cars and expensive vacations.
Understanding double income, no children (DINK)
It is believed that couples living in a DINK household have higher disposable income because they do not have the additional expenses that accompany the children. Whether by choice or by circumstance, the lack of dependents in the household can allow more income to be spent on savings or other interests. Not all double-income households without children result in significantly higher liquidity for the couple. Partner salaries remain a drag on how much people can spend and how often they can spend it.
How DINK households are structured
Long-term food, clothing and education costs associated with raising one or more children are eliminated from the household. Instead of saving money to pay for college or getting loans to pay school fees, household partners can spend that money for the comfort of the creatures for themselves.
This could allow the couple to increase their meal expenses. It could also allow them to make more purchases for their personal satisfaction in order to buy clothes that might otherwise be deemed too expensive. Consumer goods, real estate, travel and other societies can target this population by appealing to the increased availability of time and money so that the couple can have fun.
The couple would not need as much living space to adapt to themselves and their needs. In other words, they would not need to look for accommodation with bedrooms for the children. This could allow them to rent or buy homes with smaller spaces at a lower cost, or vice versa, to use the additional rooms for other purposes, such as a guest room, home office or space. personal recreation.
A double-income household, no child can also offer the couple more flexibility over their time. Without parental obligations, they may be able to adapt to a schedule that includes longer work days and business trips. They could also have more time for themselves for recreation.
The availability of more available liquidity also creates the possibility of further exploring investment opportunities. Money that could have been spent on children could be invested in stocks, bonds or other investment vehicles.
For related information, compare DINKs with “DEWKs”, a lifestyle in which both partners work and raise children.